ignorant scientists

Ignorant scientists. Science has enormous cachet and authority in our culture, for very understandable reasons! And that has led scientists (and non-scientists who claim the mantle of science) to claim public authority, which is all well and good in their areas of expertise. The problem is when they claim authority in areas where they don’t have much expertise.

One recent example is Bill Nye, the “Science Guy”.

He isn’t actually a scientist but owes his career as a popular entertainer to his purported scientific expertise. Bill Nye was recently asked for opinion about whether philosophy is a worthy pursuit. As Olivia Goldhill points out in Quartz, Nye’s answer was as self-assured as it was stunningly ignorant.

‘The video, which made the entire U.S. philosophy community collectively choke on its morning espresso, is hard to watch, because most of Nye’s statements are wrong. Not just kinda wrong, but deeply, ludicrously wrong. He merges together questions of consciousness and reality as though they’re one and the same topic, and completely misconstrues Descartes’ argument “I think, therefore I am” — to mention just two of many examples.’

Nye fell into the same trap as Neil DeGrasse Tyson and Stephen Hawking


These men of science opine is largely useless, because they can’t give us the sort of certain answers that science can, and what they say amounts to little more than speculation.

Philosophy does not give us the certainty that math or experimental science can. But that doesn’t mean that philosophy is worthless, or that it doesn’t have rigor. Indeed, in a sense, philosophy is inescapable. To argue that philosophy is useless is to do philosophy. Moreover, some existential questions simply can’t be escaped, and philosophy is one of the best, or at least least bad, ways we’ve come up with to address those questions.

Instead, we’ve become a philosophically illiterate culture at large.

philosophically illiterate culture

Seemingly, every day, you can find examples of people displaying stunning cultural illiteracy — people in positions where that simply should not happen. The great philosophical tradition that our civilization is built on is left largely untaught.

Even “liberal arts” curricula in many colleges do not teach the most influential thinkers. If our elites aren’t being taught this great tradition, then it should come as no surprise that some subset of that elite — experimental scientists and their hangers-on — don’t know it.

That’s part of the problem. But it’s just a part of it. After all, as a group, scientists have an obvious objective interest in experimental science being recognized as the only path to valuable knowledge, and therefore an interest in disdaining other paths to knowledge as less valid. People who listen to scientists opine about philosophy ought to keep that in mind.

And then there’s another factor at play.

eliminative materialism

Many, though certainly not all, of the scientists who opine loudest about the uselessness of philosophy are public atheists. The form of atheism they promote is usually known as “eliminative materialism,” or the notion that matter is the only thing that exists.

This theory is motivated by “scientism,” or the notion that the only knowable things are knowable by science. Somewhat paradoxically, these propositions are essentially religious — to dismiss entire swathes of human experience and human thought requires a venture of faith. They’re also not very smart religion, since they end up simply shouting away inconvenient propositions.

Fundamentalism is not a belief system or a religion, it’s a state of mind.

There can be fundamentalist religion, fundamentalist atheism, fundamentalist socialism, fundamentalism libertarianism. What all of them have in common is, in David Bentley Hart’s words, “a stubborn refusal to think.” The fundamentalist is not the one whose ideas are too simple or too crude. He’s the one who stubbornly refuses to think through either other ideas, or those ideas themselves.

Sadly, many of our greatest minds give us an example of this state of mind.

the week

Related Posts
The Untold Truths About Albert Einstein
Albert Einstein is undoubtedly not just one of the most well-known scientists ever but one of the most well-known figures in history, period. But while his contributions to modern society ...
How Pandas Got Their Patches – Science And Mythology
Panda patches. Giant pandas’ patches are among the most striking of any mammal: black ears and eye spots set against a white face, with dark limbs and shoulders abutting a ...
Human Gene Editing Is Leaving Ethics Dangerously Far Behind
In a breakthrough scientists successfully did gene editing of a human embryo to eliminate a dangerous gene mutation. The birth of an actual baby with genes selected by technological means ...
Astrology is what I like to believe in
Astrology has humble and ancient roots and it was always believed to have an element of “occult” to it. If you've checked out the statistics, mobile Operators in India seem to ...
Dark Matter: Is It Right In Front Of Us?
Dark Matter. We know, pretty simply, how stars work. We know how much light they give off, and that’s very closely related to their mass. Brighter stars are more massive; ...
The Untold Truths About Albert
How Pandas Got Their Patches
Human Gene Editing Is Leaving
Astrology is what I like
Dark Matter: Is It Right

Denmark Strait Cataract. It Isn't What You Think
Female Giants Accompany Their Fierce Companions
back to the top